Quick Navigation

Northern Illinois University

College of Business - NIU

NIU Journal of Selling & Major Account Management

Electronic Manuscript Review Form (For Editor)

Directions:
After you have reviewed the assigned manuscript, please fill out this form to communicate your views. The editor will use the results of the reviews to make a decision on the manuscript. Your comments are an integral part of the development and dissemination of sales knowledge.

 1. Your name:


 2. Reviewer identification number:


 3. Manuscript number:


 4. Manuscript title:


 5. Your recommendation:
Reject       Major revision       Accept with minor revision       Accept
Evaluation of Manuscript:

 6. Overall contribution to selling/Account management literature:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

 7. Significance of topic to selling/Account management:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

 8. Completeness of literature review:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

 9. Conceptual:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

10. Organization of manuscript:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

11. Writing quality:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

12. Significance of managerial implications:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

For Empirical Manuscripts only - respond to the following:
13. Methodology:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

14. Data Analysis
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

15. Presentation of Results:
Excellent       Very good       Satisfactory       Neutral       Weak       Very poor       Unacceptable      

16. Reviewer comments to the Editor:

17. Constructive comments for the author(s) to facilitate improving the manuscript:

Please type the letters you see to the right of this box.
   niu